DINA SAH AND OTHERS vs DIPNARAYAN RAI AND OTHERS — 71/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120001172019
Filing Number
71/2019
Filing Date
03-Apr-2019
Registration No
71/2019
Registration Date
03-Apr-2019
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINA SAH AND OTHERS
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
-
2.BHUNESHWAR SAH
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
-
3.BISHKARMA SAH
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
-
4.HARENDRA SAH
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPNARAYAN RAI AND OTHERS
-
2.RAJ NARAYAN RAI
-
3.SANT LAL SAH
-
4.NANDA SAH
-
5.JITENDRA SAH
-
6.RAM DAS SAH
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-May-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
05-May-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
19-Feb-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
22-Jan-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Dec-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
06-Nov-2023
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Munsiff Court, Sonpur (Saran district) passed three orders on 06.11.2023 under CPC Section 151, accepting substitution petitions filed by plaintiffs. In each case, the court allowed the substitution of deceased parties (Defendant No. 06 Ramdas Singh, Defendant No. 03 Seetlal Singh, and Plaintiff No. 01 Dina Singh) with their legal heirs, granted waiver of limitation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and dismissed the abatement objections. The court awarded costs of Rs. 200 against the defendants and permitted the suits to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
09-Oct-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Aug-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Jul-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
13-Jun-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
30-May-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
02-May-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Mar-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
24-Feb-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
10-Jan-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
22-Nov-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Oct-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
13-Sep-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
23-Aug-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-Jul-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
05-Jul-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
31-May-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
12-Apr-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-Feb-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
18-Jan-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Dec-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
02-Nov-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
01-Oct-2021
Hearing
Munsif
-
14-Sep-2021
Hearing
Munsif
-
06-Aug-2021
Hearing
Munsif
-
08-Jul-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
08-Jun-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
04-May-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
06-Apr-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
09-Mar-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
09-Feb-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
05-Jan-2021
Arguments
Munsif
-
08-Dec-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
15-Oct-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
02-Sep-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
21-Jul-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
09-Jun-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
01-Apr-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
14-Feb-2020
Arguments
Munsif
-
17-Dec-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
03-Dec-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
11-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2019
Summary: The Munsiff Court, Sonpur (Saran district) passed three orders on 06.11.2023 under CPC Section 151, accepting substitution petitions filed by plaintiffs. In each case, the court allowed the substitution of deceased parties (Defendant No. 06 Ramdas Singh, Defendant No. 03 Seetlal Singh, and Plaintiff No. 01 Dina Singh) with their legal heirs, granted waiver of limitation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and dismissed the abatement objections. The court awarded costs of Rs. 200 against the defendants and permitted the suits to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts