RITU KUMARI AND OTHERS vs SANJAY SAH AND OTHERS Advocate - JITENDRA PRASAD — 263/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Further Proceeding. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRSR120001062015
Filing Number
263/2015
Filing Date
21-Jul-2015
Registration No
263/2015
Registration Date
21-Jul-2015
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
3-Sub Judge II
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITU KUMARI AND OTHERS
Adv. LAKSHMI NARAYAN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAY SAH AND OTHERS Advocate - JITENDRA PRASAD
-
2.SANJAY SAH
-
3.RAJ KUMARI
-
4.NIBHA KUMARI
-
5.LALITA DEVI
-
6.NARAYAN SAH
-
7.RAMJI SAH
-
8.SHYAM JI SAH
-
9.FULKUMARI
-
10.LAL PARI DEVI
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
19-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Further Proceeding
Sub Judge II
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Proceeding
Sub Judge II
-
03-Feb-2026
Further Proceeding
Sub Judge II
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
20-May-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary In this partition/inheritance dispute (Bench Wad No. 263 of 2015) from District Court Sonapur, Saran, Bihar, the court allowed the petitioner Bablu Kumar's application to be made a party-respondent (defendant no. 11-12) in the suit dated 22.06.2023. The court found that Bablu Kumar, as a bona fide purchaser and holder of the disputed land, is a necessary party to the proceedings. The petitioner's application was approved with a cost of ₹500 to be deposited with the Bihar government, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
11-Mar-2025
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
28-Jan-2025
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
23-Dec-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
28-Oct-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
07-Oct-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
16-Sep-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jul-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
07-May-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
02-Apr-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jan-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
16-Dec-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
05-Sep-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
22-Jun-2023
OrderView PDF
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
05-Dec-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Oct-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
11-Aug-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
04-Jul-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jun-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
27-Apr-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
09-Mar-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
05-Jan-2022
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
17-Nov-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
01-Sep-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jun-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
31-Mar-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
03-Feb-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Dec-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
07-Oct-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
05-Aug-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
03-Jun-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
19-Feb-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
03-Feb-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
16-Dec-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
21-Oct-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
07-Sep-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
17-Aug-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jun-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
27-May-2019
Hearing
Munsif
-
06-May-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Apr-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
18-Mar-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
28-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 263/2015
Summary In this partition/inheritance dispute (Bench Wad No. 263 of 2015) from District Court Sonapur, Saran, Bihar, the court allowed the petitioner Bablu Kumar's application to be made a party-respondent (defendant no. 11-12) in the suit dated 22.06.2023. The court found that Bablu Kumar, as a bona fide purchaser and holder of the disputed land, is a necessary party to the proceedings. The petitioner's application was approved with a cost of ₹500 to be deposited with the Bihar government, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts