RAM RATAN PRASAD SINGH vs KRISHNA PRASAD RAY AND OTHERS Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA — 331/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRSR120000592013

Filing Number

331/2013

Filing Date

23-Apr-2013

Registration No

331/2013

Registration Date

23-Apr-2013

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM RATAN PRASAD SINGH

    Adv. NAWAL KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA PRASAD RAY AND OTHERS Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  17. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  19. 04-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  20. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  22. 23-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  23. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  24. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  25. 02-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  26. 23-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  27. 12-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  28. 07-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  29. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge

  30. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  31. 01-May-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  32. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  33. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  34. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  35. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  36. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  37. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  38. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  39. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  40. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  41. 07-May-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  42. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  43. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  44. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  45. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  46. 22-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  47. 17-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  48. 17-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  49. 13-Jun-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  50. 03-May-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  51. 10-Mar-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  52. 07-Mar-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  53. 02-Feb-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  54. 06-Dec-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  55. 11-Nov-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  56. 16-Sep-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  57. 23-Jul-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  58. 27-Jun-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  59. 25-Apr-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  60. 14-Mar-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  61. 24-Jan-2022

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The petition is allowed. The court granted relief to the petitioner by quashing and setting aside a government order dated 09.05.2018 that had cancelled a previous order granting permission. The court found the cancellation order to be illegal and without proper justification, directing the respondent to file a fresh affidavit complying with the court's directions. The case is scheduled for final hearing on 14.03.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  62. 24-Jan-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  63. 04-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  64. 22-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  65. 06-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  66. 09-Aug-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  67. 24-May-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  68. 19-Apr-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  69. 01-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  70. 07-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  71. 19-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  72. 23-Sep-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub-Judge

  73. 30-Jun-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub Judge II

  74. 19-May-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub Judge II

  75. 31-Mar-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub Judge II

  76. 24-Feb-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub Judge II

  77. 23-Jan-2020

    Evicence of defendent / Op

  78. 05-Dec-2019

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub-Judge

  79. 17-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  80. 05-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  81. 25-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  82. 30-May-2019

    Evidence

    Munsif

  83. 10-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  84. 13-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  85. 13-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  86. 23-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 331/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition is allowed. The court granted relief to the petitioner by quashing and setting aside a government order dated 09.05.2018 that had cancelled a previous order granting permission. The court found the cancellation order to be illegal and without proper justification, directing the respondent to file a fresh affidavit complying with the court's directions. The case is scheduled for final hearing on 14.03.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case