SUDAMA CHANDRA BHUSHAN vs PRITHVI CHANDRA BHUSHAN — 89/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BRSR120000552021

Filing Number

55/2021

Filing Date

06-Mar-2021

Registration No

89/2021

Registration Date

28-Aug-2021

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDAMA CHANDRA BHUSHAN

    Adv. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRITHVI CHANDRA BHUSHAN

  2. 2.KRISHNA CHANDRA BHUSHAN

  3. 3.ATUL KUMAR

  4. 4.RAHUL KUMAR SONI

  5. 5.NAND KISHORE PRASAD

  6. 6.OM PRAKASH PRASAD

  7. 7.JAI PRAKASH PRASAD

  8. 8.VIJAY PRAKASH PRASAD

  9. 9.PREM PRAKASH PRASAD

  10. 10.ANMOL PRASAD

  11. 11.SANTOSH KUMAR SONI

  12. 12.MUNNA KUMAR SONI

  13. 13.MUKESH KUMAR SONI

  14. 14.SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD

  15. 15.SAMBHU PRASAD

  16. 16.ANIL KUMAR

  17. 17.SUNIL KUMAR

  18. 18.RAJ KUMAR

  19. 19.PANKAJ KUMAR SONI

  20. 20.BHAGIRATH KUMAR SONI

  21. 21.MOST. INDU DEVI

  22. 22.HARENDRA PRASAD

  23. 23.YOGENDRA PRASAD

  24. 24.SURENDRA PRASAD

  25. 25.SURESH PRASAD

  26. 26.MANISH PRASAD

  27. 27.RAMESH PRASAD

  28. 28.RANJEET PRASAD

  29. 29.RAJEEV PRASAD

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Sub-Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Sub-Judge

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Sub-Judge

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Sub-Judge

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    The plaintiff's petition for injunction under Order 39 of CPC is rejected and dismissed. The court found that although a prima facie case exists for both parties as co-sharers in the joint property, the balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned for further proceedings on partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  12. 10-Jul-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  15. 06-Jun-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  16. 30-May-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  17. 23-May-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  18. 08-Apr-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  22. 03-Jan-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  23. 20-Dec-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  24. 06-Dec-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  25. 25-Oct-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  26. 17-Oct-2024

    OrderView PDF

  27. 17-Oct-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  28. 26-Sep-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  29. 22-Aug-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  30. 21-Jun-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  31. 11-Jun-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  32. 22-May-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  33. 04-Apr-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  34. 20-Feb-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  35. 01-Feb-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  36. 22-Dec-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  37. 19-Oct-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  38. 11-Oct-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  39. 21-Sep-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  40. 19-Sep-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  41. 31-Jul-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  42. 15-Jul-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  43. 01-Jul-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  44. 22-Jun-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  45. 14-Jun-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  46. 02-May-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  47. 06-Mar-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  48. 10-Feb-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  49. 30-Jan-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  50. 17-Nov-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  51. 19-Oct-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  52. 21-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  53. 30-Aug-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  54. 29-Jul-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  55. 15-Jul-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  56. 06-Jul-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  57. 24-Jun-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  58. 06-Apr-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  59. 23-Mar-2022

    OrderView PDF

  60. 23-Mar-2022

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  61. 24-Feb-2022

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  62. 20-Jan-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  63. 25-Nov-2021

    Notification - Publication

    Sub-Judge

  64. 30-Sep-2021

    Show Cause

    Sub-Judge

  65. 02-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 06-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The plaintiff's petition for injunction under Order 39 of CPC is rejected and dismissed. The court found that although a prima facie case exists for both parties as co-sharers in the joint property, the balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned for further proceedings on partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case