BALI RAY AND OTHERS vs VIRENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - MANINDRA KUMAR THAKUR — 642/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Order. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120000472015
Filing Number
642/2015
Filing Date
21-Dec-2015
Registration No
642/2015
Registration Date
21-Dec-2015
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
3-Sub Judge II
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALI RAY AND OTHERS
Adv. MD. MUSTAFA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIRENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - MANINDRA KUMAR THAKUR
-
2.BIRENDRA SINGH
-
3.GANDHI SINGH
-
4.RAVINDRA SINGH
-
5.RAMAYAN RAI
-
6.JODHA RAI
-
7.SHIV NANDAN RAI
-
8.DAHARI SINGH
-
9.KEDAR SINGH
-
10.BHANNU SINGH(Legal Heir)
-
11.RATNESHWAR PD. SINGH(Legal Heir)
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Order
Sub Judge II
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
Sub Judge II
-
10-Feb-2026
Order
Sub Judge II
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
04-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
09-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
26-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
19-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
12-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
05-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge II
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
13-May-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-May-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
07-May-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
19-Sep-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge
-
20-Jun-2023
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
16-May-2023
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
14-Mar-2023
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
13-Dec-2022
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
15-Nov-2022
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
13-Oct-2022
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
02-Aug-2022
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
05-Jul-2022
Notification - Publication
Sub-Judge
-
17-May-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Mar-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
15-Feb-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
11-Jan-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
07-Dec-2021
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
23-Nov-2021
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court found that the applicant's petition lacked merit, as both the defendant and applicant belonged to the same village, making the application invalid. The court also directed the applicant to file a proper petition under Section 10 of the relevant act, clarifying that the current petition could not be entertained in its present form. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Nov-2021
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
14-Sep-2021
Order
Sub-Judge
-
03-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
18-May-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Apr-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Mar-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Feb-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
12-Jan-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
20-Oct-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Oct-2020
Substitution
Sub-Judge
-
29-Sep-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
14-Jul-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
26-May-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
21-Apr-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
25-Feb-2020
Rejoinder
Sub Judge II
-
28-Jan-2020
Rejoinder
-
21-Jan-2020
Rejoinder
-
14-Jan-2020
Hearing
-
17-Dec-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
03-Dec-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
26-Nov-2019
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
19-Nov-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
18-Oct-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
13-Sep-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
02-Aug-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
23-Jul-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
09-Jul-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
25-Jun-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jun-2019
Amended Plaint
Sub-Judge
-
28-May-2019
Hearing
Munsif
-
14-May-2019
Hearing
Munsif
-
30-Apr-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
23-Apr-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Apr-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
26-Mar-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
19-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
05-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
29-Jan-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
22-Jan-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
08-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 642/2015
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court found that the applicant's petition lacked merit, as both the defendant and applicant belonged to the same village, making the application invalid. The court also directed the applicant to file a proper petition under Section 10 of the relevant act, clarifying that the current petition could not be entertained in its present form. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts