BALRAM PRASAD AND OTHERS vs AJEET KUMAR MANDAL AND OTHERS Advocate - NAWAL KUMAR SINGH — 332/2010
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRSR120000392010
Filing Number
332/2010
Filing Date
03-Jun-2010
Registration No
332/2010
Registration Date
03-Jun-2010
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
3-Sub Judge II
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALRAM PRASAD AND OTHERS
Adv. NAWAL KUAMR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJEET KUMAR MANDAL AND OTHERS Advocate - NAWAL KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
22-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
23-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
24-May-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
03-May-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
22-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
12-May-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Nov-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
21-Oct-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jun-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
31-Mar-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Jan-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Nov-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
26-Aug-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
08-Jul-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Jun-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Apr-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
11-Feb-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
24-Dec-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
03-Dec-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Oct-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Aug-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
10-Jun-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
08-Apr-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
26-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
13-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
08-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
20-Nov-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
21-Oct-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
07-Sep-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
09-Aug-2019
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Suit No. 332 of 2010, Sonpur Sarani, Bihar Date: 09-08-2019 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for an injunction (Order 39 Rules 1&2 and Section 151 CPC) has been dismissed. The court found that the defendants had prior legal ownership and possession of the disputed land (Survey No. 169, Plot 10) through a registered deed dated 18-04-1988, supported by previous court judgments in eviction and Section 145 proceedings. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claim lacks prima facie merit and the balance of convenience favors the defendants, therefore dismissing the plaintiff's petition for an injunction order. The case is adjourned for further proceedings to 07-09-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Aug-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
03-Aug-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jul-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
10-Jul-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
03-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
08-Feb-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Feb-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2010
Case filed
Registration No. 332/2010
Court Order Summary Case: Suit No. 332 of 2010, Sonpur Sarani, Bihar Date: 09-08-2019 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for an injunction (Order 39 Rules 1&2 and Section 151 CPC) has been dismissed. The court found that the defendants had prior legal ownership and possession of the disputed land (Survey No. 169, Plot 10) through a registered deed dated 18-04-1988, supported by previous court judgments in eviction and Section 145 proceedings. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claim lacks prima facie merit and the balance of convenience favors the defendants, therefore dismissing the plaintiff's petition for an injunction order. The case is adjourned for further proceedings to 07-09-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts