RAJESH KUMAR vs BACHCHA LAL SHARMA — 37/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: NOTICE (READY. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BRSR120000372023

NOTICE (READY

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

37/2023

Filing Date

08-02-2023

Registration No

37/2023

Registration Date

13-06-2023

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

3-Sub Judge II

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 9

Petitioner(s)

RAJESH KUMAR

Adv. NITISH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

BACHCHA LAL SHARMA

MANJU DEVI

ARJUN SHARMA

MANJU DEVI

RAM LAL SHARMA

DINANATH SHARMA

SUNDARI DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Sub Judge II

21-04-2026

NOTICE (READY

10-03-2026

NOTICE (READY

27-01-2026

NOTICE (READY

03-01-2026

NOTICE (READY

06-12-2025

NOTICE (READY

Interim Orders

20-02-2024
Order

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition dated 24.07.2023 under CPC Rule 26 Rule 09 and Section 151 seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner. An advocate commissioner, Shri Aravind Kumar Singh, was appointed to inspect the property in question where defendant no. 05 is allegedly conducting construction work on an old demolished building, with materials like bricks, sand, and cement stockpiled at the site. The plaintiff is directed to deposit the commissioner's fee of ₹3,000 as directed by the court, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition dated 24.07.2023 under CPC Rule 26 Rule 09 and Section 151 seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner. An advocate commissioner, Shri Aravind Kumar Singh, was appointed to inspect the property in question where defendant no. 05 is allegedly conducting construction work on an old demolished building, with materials like bricks, sand, and cement stockpiled at the site. The plaintiff is directed to deposit the commissioner's fee of ₹3,000 as directed by the court, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sonepur Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case