RAJESH KUMAR vs BACHCHA LAL SHARMA — 37/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: NOTICE (READY. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRSR120000372023
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
37/2023
Filing Date
08-02-2023
Registration No
37/2023
Registration Date
13-06-2023
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
3-Sub Judge II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH KUMAR
Adv. NITISH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
BACHCHA LAL SHARMA
MANJU DEVI
ARJUN SHARMA
MANJU DEVI
RAM LAL SHARMA
DINANATH SHARMA
SUNDARI DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub Judge II
NOTICE (READY
NOTICE (READY
NOTICE (READY
NOTICE (READY
NOTICE (READY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | NOTICE (READY | |
| 10-03-2026 | NOTICE (READY | |
| 27-01-2026 | NOTICE (READY | |
| 03-01-2026 | NOTICE (READY | |
| 06-12-2025 | NOTICE (READY |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition dated 24.07.2023 under CPC Rule 26 Rule 09 and Section 151 seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner. An advocate commissioner, Shri Aravind Kumar Singh, was appointed to inspect the property in question where defendant no. 05 is allegedly conducting construction work on an old demolished building, with materials like bricks, sand, and cement stockpiled at the site. The plaintiff is directed to deposit the commissioner's fee of ₹3,000 as directed by the court, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition dated 24.07.2023 under CPC Rule 26 Rule 09 and Section 151 seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner. An advocate commissioner, Shri Aravind Kumar Singh, was appointed to inspect the property in question where defendant no. 05 is allegedly conducting construction work on an old demolished building, with materials like bricks, sand, and cement stockpiled at the site. The plaintiff is directed to deposit the commissioner's fee of ₹3,000 as directed by the court, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts