MD. ALI AND OTHERS vs MANTI DEVI AND OTHERS — 85/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Order. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Order Next hearing 05-May-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRSR120000332017

Filing Number

85/2017

Filing Date

02-May-2017

Registration No

85/2017

Registration Date

02-May-2017

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. ALI AND OTHERS

    Adv. SAHAULIYA PD. SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANTI DEVI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  8. 22-Nov-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  13. 03-Jun-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  15. 25-Mar-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  16. 11-Feb-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  18. 19-Nov-2024

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  19. 22-Oct-2024

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  20. 27-Aug-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  21. 06-Jul-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  22. 04-Jun-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  23. 07-May-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  25. 05-Mar-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  26. 16-Feb-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  27. 30-Jan-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  28. 16-Jan-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  29. 09-Jan-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  30. 05-Jan-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  31. 02-Jan-2024

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  32. 22-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  33. 19-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  34. 15-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  35. 12-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  36. 05-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  37. 01-Dec-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  38. 28-Nov-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  39. 09-Nov-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  40. 07-Nov-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  41. 10-Oct-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  42. 23-Sep-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  43. 13-Sep-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  44. 02-Sep-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  45. 28-Aug-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  46. 20-Jul-2023

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  47. 07-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  48. 04-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  49. 20-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  50. 13-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  51. 06-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  52. 18-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  53. 02-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  54. 15-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  55. 24-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  56. 20-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  57. 28-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  58. 16-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  59. 03-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  60. 18-Oct-2022

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: In this property dispute (Case No. 85/2017) heard on October 18, 2022, the court allowed the plaintiff's petition to appoint a court commissioner (Adhikavta Aayukt) to conduct an on-site inspection of the disputed land. The plaintiff alleged that defendants have begun construction work with bricks, sand, and cement on the disputed property, attempting to alter its character. The court found the plaintiff's application justified and ordered the appointment of a commissioner with a fee of ₹2,500 to be deposited by the plaintiff, with the case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  61. 18-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  62. 30-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  63. 20-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  64. 13-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  65. 23-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  66. 11-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  67. 04-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  68. 19-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  69. 18-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  70. 02-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  71. 24-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  72. 17-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  73. 09-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  74. 19-May-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  75. 07-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge

  76. 03-Mar-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  77. 27-Jan-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  78. 09-Dec-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  79. 28-Oct-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  80. 07-Sep-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  81. 27-Jul-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  82. 11-May-2021

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  83. 09-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  84. 19-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  85. 15-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  86. 20-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  87. 23-Sep-2020

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  88. 12-Aug-2020

    Further Proceeding

    Sub Judge II

  89. 05-Jun-2020

    Further Proceeding

    Sub Judge II

  90. 17-Mar-2020

    Further Proceeding

    Sub Judge II

  91. 28-Jan-2020

    Further Proceeding

    Sub Judge II

  92. 17-Dec-2019

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  93. 23-Nov-2019

    OrderView PDF

  94. 23-Nov-2019

    Further Proceeding

    Sub-Judge

  95. 06-Nov-2019

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  96. 27-Sep-2019

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  97. 30-Aug-2019

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  98. 16-Aug-2019

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  99. 19-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  100. 28-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  101. 17-May-2019

    Evidence

    Munsif

  102. 12-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  103. 22-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  104. 30-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 02-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this property dispute (Case No. 85/2017) heard on October 18, 2022, the court allowed the plaintiff's petition to appoint a court commissioner (Adhikavta Aayukt) to conduct an on-site inspection of the disputed land. The plaintiff alleged that defendants have begun construction work with bricks, sand, and cement on the disputed property, attempting to alter its character. The court found the plaintiff's application justified and ordered the appointment of a commissioner with a fee of ₹2,500 to be deposited by the plaintiff, with the case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case