JITENDRA BHARATI AND vs SHIVPARASI PD. RAI Advocate - CHANDRIKA PD. SINGH — 165/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Compromise. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120000072012
Filing Number
165/2012
Filing Date
02-Mar-2012
Registration No
165/2012
Registration Date
02-Mar-2012
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA BHARATI AND
Adv. ALOK KUMAR DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVPARASI PD. RAI Advocate - CHANDRIKA PD. SINGH
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
06-May-2026
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Compromise
-
25-Feb-2026
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Compromise
Sub-Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-May-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-May-2024
Notice (Ready
Sub-Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary - 165/2012 The petition filed by Jitendra Bharati was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500 on 22.03.2024 by the First Additional District Judge, Sonpur, Saran. The case abated after the death of the original respondent Shivparasi Rai on 17.12.2022. The petitioner's application for substitution of legal heirs and abatement under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was accepted, and the petition was accordingly disposed. The petitioner was ordered to deposit the cost amount with the Bihar Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Mar-2024
Notice (Ready
Sub-Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Notice (Ready
Sub-Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Order
Sub-Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
OrderView PDF
-
05-Dec-2023
Order
Sub-Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Apr-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
04-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
06-Dec-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
21-May-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Apr-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Mar-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jan-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Jan-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
22-Oct-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
20-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
11-Jun-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
30-Apr-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
19-Mar-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
12-Feb-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
08-Jan-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
13-Nov-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
22-Sep-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
25-Aug-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jun-2020
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
11-May-2020
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
24-Mar-2020
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
19-Mar-2020
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
03-Mar-2020
Hearing
Sub Judge II
-
04-Feb-2020
Order
Sub Judge II
-
14-Jan-2020
Order
-
17-Dec-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
03-Dec-2019
Order
Sub-Judge
-
05-Nov-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
01-Oct-2019
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
03-Sep-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Aug-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
25-Jun-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-May-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
02-Apr-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
26-Feb-2019
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
29-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 165/2012
Case Summary - 165/2012 The petition filed by Jitendra Bharati was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500 on 22.03.2024 by the First Additional District Judge, Sonpur, Saran. The case abated after the death of the original respondent Shivparasi Rai on 17.12.2022. The petitioner's application for substitution of legal heirs and abatement under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was accepted, and the petition was accordingly disposed. The petitioner was ordered to deposit the cost amount with the Bihar Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts