MARACHHO DEVI AND OTHERS vs RAM LALIT RAY AND OTHERS Advocate - SANJAY SINGH — 403/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Rejoinder. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Rejoinder Next hearing 05-May-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRSR120000042016

Filing Number

403/2016

Filing Date

23-Aug-2016

Registration No

403/2016

Registration Date

23-Aug-2016

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARACHHO DEVI AND OTHERS

    Adv. UDAY KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM LALIT RAY AND OTHERS Advocate - SANJAY SINGH

  2. 2.SHIV NARAYAN RAI

  3. 3.SATYANARAYAN RAI

  4. 4.SAMBHU RAI

  5. 5.VIJAY RAI

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  9. 07-Oct-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  17. 03-Jun-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  18. 20-May-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  19. 22-Apr-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  20. 08-Apr-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  21. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  22. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  23. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  24. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  25. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  26. 26-Nov-2024

    Order

    Sub-Judge

  27. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  28. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  29. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  30. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  31. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  32. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  33. 07-May-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  34. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  35. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  36. 13-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge

  37. 23-Jan-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  38. 02-Jan-2024

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  39. 19-Dec-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  40. 07-Nov-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  41. 26-Sep-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  42. 19-Aug-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's substitution application with cost. Since plaintiff No. 02 (Someriya Devi) died on 23.05.2022, plaintiff No. 03 sought to substitute her name in the suit and replace her with legal heirs, but the application was found to have caused the case to abate. The court accordingly dismissed the substitution application dated 18.07.2023 under Rule 22(3) CPC with costs of ₹500 imposed on the plaintiff, payable to the Bihar Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  43. 19-Aug-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  44. 18-Jul-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  45. 20-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  46. 16-May-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  47. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  48. 24-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  49. 13-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  50. 22-Nov-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  51. 18-Oct-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  52. 27-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  53. 06-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  54. 26-Jul-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  55. 28-Jun-2022

    OrderView PDF

  56. 28-Jun-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  57. 07-Jun-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  58. 27-Apr-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  59. 09-Mar-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  60. 12-Jan-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  61. 03-Nov-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  62. 18-Aug-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  63. 09-Jun-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  64. 24-Mar-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  65. 20-Jan-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge

  66. 03-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  67. 14-Sep-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge

  68. 21-Aug-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge

  69. 12-Jun-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub Judge II

  70. 08-May-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub Judge II

  71. 17-Apr-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub Judge II

  72. 25-Feb-2020

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub Judge II

  73. 04-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge II

  74. 21-Jan-2020

    Evidence

  75. 07-Jan-2020

    Evidence

  76. 10-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  77. 03-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  78. 26-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  79. 15-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  80. 08-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  81. 27-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  82. 13-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  83. 02-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Sub-Judge

  84. 26-Jul-2019

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge

  85. 02-Jul-2019

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge

  86. 11-Jun-2019

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Munsif

  87. 07-May-2019

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge

  88. 19-Mar-2019

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge

  89. 12-Feb-2019

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge

  90. 18-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  91. 23-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's substitution application with cost. Since plaintiff No. 02 (Someriya Devi) died on 23.05.2022, plaintiff No. 03 sought to substitute her name in the suit and replace her with legal heirs, but the application was found to have caused the case to abate. The court accordingly dismissed the substitution application dated 18.07.2023 under Rule 22(3) CPC with costs of ₹500 imposed on the plaintiff, payable to the Bihar Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case