State of Bihar vs Upendar Rai and 10 ors — 320/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,324,341,379,504. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRSR110003512025
Filing Number
337/2025
Filing Date
20-Jan-2022
Registration No
320/2025
Registration Date
20-Jan-2022
Court
Sonepur CJM Division
Judge
3-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
221
Police Station
SONEPUR
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Upendar Rai and 10 ors
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
The petition filed by Brijesh Mohan is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner was posted as an executive officer at Sampur Nagar Panchayat with no allegations against him, and that the FIR registered against him was based on the informant's claims rather than concrete evidence. The court directed that prima facie case be examined against the petitioner, and all accused must be physically present on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-Jan-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Jan-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
22-Nov-2025
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 320/2025
The petition filed by Brijesh Mohan is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner was posted as an executive officer at Sampur Nagar Panchayat with no allegations against him, and that the FIR registered against him was based on the informant's claims rather than concrete evidence. The court directed that prima facie case be examined against the petitioner, and all accused must be physically present on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts