Uma Shankar Singh vs State of Bihar — 5056/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,188,341,323,324,307,353,332,333,506,34. Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 24th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010162332025
e-Filing Number
24-12-2025
Filing Number
14845/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Registration No
5056/2025
Registration Date
24-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
92
Police Station
PARSA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Uma Shankar Singh
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
2.Pappu Kumar Ray
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Uma Shankar Singh and Pappu Kumar Ray, who were accused of serious offences including disturbance of public order, assault on police personnel, and damage to government property during a public gathering in March 2024. The court denied bail primarily on grounds of parity, noting that similarly situated co-accused persons facing identical allegations had already been denied bail by both the High Court and Sessions Court, and the present petitioners' roles were comparable in nature and gravity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5056/2025
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Uma Shankar Singh and Pappu Kumar Ray, who were accused of serious offences including disturbance of public order, assault on police personnel, and damage to government property during a public gathering in March 2024. The court denied bail primarily on grounds of parity, noting that similarly situated co-accused persons facing identical allegations had already been denied bail by both the High Court and Sessions Court, and the present petitioners' roles were comparable in nature and gravity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts