Ashok Ram vs State of Bihar — 4855/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 467,468,471,420,414,120(B). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 06th April 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010153322025
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
14016/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
4855/2025
Registration Date
12-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
405
Police Station
MARHAURA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashok Ram
Adv. Chandra Kant Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The court rejected Ashok Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a motorcycle theft case registered under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, and 120(B). The court found that Ram's name was introduced based on confessional statements of arrested co-accused who were caught with a stolen motorcycle, corroborated by informant and witness statements in the case diary, making the grounds for bail insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
02-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
15-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4855/2025
Summary: The court rejected Ashok Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a motorcycle theft case registered under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, and 120(B). The court found that Ram's name was introduced based on confessional statements of arrested co-accused who were caught with a stolen motorcycle, corroborated by informant and witness statements in the case diary, making the grounds for bail insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts