RABI KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 4654/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010146262025
e-Filing Number
28-11-2025
Filing Number
13361/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
4654/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
249
Police Station
DORIGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RABI KUMAR
Adv. Prakash Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Rabi Kumar in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs. 1,67,500/- meant for educational goods. The judge found the two-year delay in filing the FIR unjustified and noted the dispute appeared primarily commercial in nature. Bail was set at Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4654/2025
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Rabi Kumar in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs. 1,67,500/- meant for educational goods. The judge found the two-year delay in filing the FIR unjustified and noted the dispute appeared primarily commercial in nature. Bail was set at Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts