Kamlesh Kumar vs State of Bihar — 4526/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),85,115(2),303(2),352,351,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismiss for Default on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010141322025

e-Filing Number

20-11-2025

Filing Number

12895/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

4526/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismiss for Default

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

964

Police Station

SONEPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),85,115(2),303(2),352,351,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamlesh Kumar

    Adv. Munni Lal Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Saran dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Kamlesh Kumar for non-prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared on repeated calls over four consecutive court dates. The court inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the bail petition and consequently rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4526/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Saran dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Kamlesh Kumar for non-prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared on repeated calls over four consecutive court dates. The court inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the bail petition and consequently rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case