State Of Bihar Vikash Kumar Singh (Thana Incharge) vs Sadhu Mahto — 427/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 413,414,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRSR010088932022

Filing Number

8874/2022

Filing Date

17-Aug-2022

Registration No

427/2022

Registration Date

25-Aug-2022

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

4-11th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

130

Police Station

PANAPUR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 413,414,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar Vikash Kumar Singh (Thana Incharge)

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sadhu Mahto

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Sadhu Mehto of charges under IPC Sections 413/414/34 (criminal breach of trust and dishonestly receiving stolen property). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses (police officers) could not identify the accused in court, did not recognize the seized motorcycles as stolen, and provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. Consequently, the accused was discharged of all accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    11th D.A.S.J.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    11th D.A.S.J.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    11th D.A.S.J.

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    11th D.A.S.J.

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    11th D.A.S.J.

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  16. 27-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  18. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  20. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  21. 24-May-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    11th D.A.S.J.

  23. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  24. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  25. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  26. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  27. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  28. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  29. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  30. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  31. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  32. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  33. 28-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  34. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  35. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  36. 31-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  37. 18-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  38. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  39. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  40. 09-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  41. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  42. 23-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  43. 23-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  44. 30-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 17-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 427/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Sadhu Mehto of charges under IPC Sections 413/414/34 (criminal breach of trust and dishonestly receiving stolen property). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the four prosecution witnesses (police officers) could not identify the accused in court, did not recognize the seized motorcycles as stolen, and provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. Consequently, the accused was discharged of all accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case