Golu Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1180/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109(1)/352/351(2)(3)/117(2)/3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 09th April 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010044992026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
4180/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
1180/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
22-14th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
PARSA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Golu Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
2.Munna Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
3.Bipin Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
4.Nitesh Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
5.Jitendra Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
6.Dinkar Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
-
7.Sharwan Kumar
Adv. Jeewanandan Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Case 1180/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Saran granted anticipatory bail to seven petitioners (Golu Kumar, Munna Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Nitesh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, Dinkar Kumar, and Shrawan Kumar) accused of assault and criminal intimidation following a caste-based incident during a wedding procession. The court found only general allegations without specific overt acts against the petitioners, noted that injuries were predominantly simple in nature, and observed that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted regular bail, justifying the grant of anticipatory bail with surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
14th D.A.S.J.
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1180/2026
Case 1180/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Saran granted anticipatory bail to seven petitioners (Golu Kumar, Munna Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Nitesh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, Dinkar Kumar, and Shrawan Kumar) accused of assault and criminal intimidation following a caste-based incident during a wedding procession. The court found only general allegations without specific overt acts against the petitioners, noted that injuries were predominantly simple in nature, and observed that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted regular bail, justifying the grant of anticipatory bail with surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts