Raktu Mahto vs State of Bihar — 506/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),351(2),353,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010044422026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

4133/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

506/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

25-6th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

PAHALEJA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),351(2),353,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raktu Mahto

    Adv. Ramesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Raktu Mahto, accused of assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), finding the allegations against him were vague and omnibus in nature. The court considered that he had already undergone custody since 21/01/2026 and that the victim's injuries were simple and non-repetitive, warranting his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    6th D.A.S.J.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    6th D.A.S.J.

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th D.A.S.J.

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 506/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Raktu Mahto, accused of assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), finding the allegations against him were vague and omnibus in nature. The court considered that he had already undergone custody since 21/01/2026 and that the victim's injuries were simple and non-repetitive, warranting his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case