Ruby Devi vs State of Bihar — 1153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010044132026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

4111/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

1153/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

MAKER

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ruby Devi

    Adv. KUMUD RANJAN PANDEY

  2. 2.Savita Devi

    Adv. KUMUD RANJAN PANDEY

  3. 3.Ram Saroj Devi

    Adv. KUMUD RANJAN PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Rubi Devi, Savita Devi, and Ram Saroj Devi) in an assault case. The judge found that the injury sustained by the complainant did not prima facie support the serious charge under Section 109 BNS, the remaining offences were bailable, and a counter-case existed between the parties, indicating possible mutual allegations. Each petitioner was released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1153/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Rubi Devi, Savita Devi, and Ram Saroj Devi) in an assault case. The judge found that the injury sustained by the complainant did not prima facie support the serious charge under Section 109 BNS, the remaining offences were bailable, and a counter-case existed between the parties, indicating possible mutual allegations. Each petitioner was released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case