State of Bihar vs Ram Janam Prasad and 08 Other — 300/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504. Disposed: Contested--Convicted on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRSR010040722019

Filing Number

3202/2019

Filing Date

08-Apr-2019

Registration No

300/2019

Registration Date

03-Jun-2019

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

5-4th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

316

Police Station

MASHRAKH

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. D.P.O

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Janam Prasad and 08 Other

  2. 2.Rajkumar Manjhi

  3. 3.Ram Babu Prasad

  4. 4.Ram Ekbal Manjhi

  5. 5.Dhanesh Manjhi

  6. 6.Satyendra Manjhi

  7. 7.Guddu Manjhi

  8. 8.Ajay Manjhi

  9. 9.Nagendra Manjhi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary Case: Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 316/2017, Additional Sessions Judge IV, Saran (04.06.2026) Verdict: Of nine accused charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and attempted murder, the court acquitted seven (Ram Janam Prasad, Ram Babu Prasad, Ram Ekbal Manjhi, Dhanesh Manjhi, Satyendra Manjhi, Guddu Manjhi, and Arjun Manjhi) for failing to prove unlawful assembly. However, Raj Kumar Manjhi was convicted under IPC §325 (grievous hurt—3 years RI + ₹10,000 fine) and Nagendra Manjhi under §323 (simple hurt—6 months SI + ₹1,000 fine), with evidence establishing they specifically assaulted the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    4th D.A.S.J.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    4th D.A.S.J.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  16. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  17. 19-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  18. 01-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  19. 25-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  21. 30-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  22. 06-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  23. 15-May-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  24. 07-May-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  25. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  26. 08-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  27. 20-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    4th D.A.S.J.

  28. 25-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  29. 17-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  30. 30-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  31. 20-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  32. 26-Nov-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  33. 21-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  34. 20-Sep-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  35. 17-Aug-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  36. 06-Jul-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  37. 13-Jun-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  38. 10-May-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  39. 16-Mar-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  40. 16-Feb-2024

    Defence Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  41. 12-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  42. 07-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  43. 04-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    A.D.J 4

  44. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  45. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  46. 20-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  47. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  48. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  49. 05-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  50. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  51. 12-May-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  52. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  53. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  54. 23-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  55. 13-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    A.D.J 4

  56. 01-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  57. 31-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  58. 13-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  59. 25-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  60. 20-Oct-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  61. 13-Oct-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  62. 20-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  63. 12-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  64. 02-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  65. 18-Aug-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  66. 04-Aug-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  67. 13-Jul-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  68. 26-May-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  69. 04-Apr-2022

    Rejoinder

    ADJ 12

  70. 10-Dec-2021

    Rejoinder

    A.D.J 11

  71. 03-Nov-2021

    Rejoinder

    A.D.J 11

  72. 21-Sep-2021

    Rejoinder

    A.D.J 11

  73. 16-Aug-2021

    Rejoinder

    A.D.J 11

  74. 19-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    A.D.J 11

  75. 21-May-2021

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  76. 20-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  77. 22-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  78. 22-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  79. 03-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  80. 19-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  81. 20-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  82. 23-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  83. 29-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  84. 03-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  85. 06-May-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  86. 30-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  87. 16-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  88. 25-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  89. 06-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  90. 20-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  91. 20-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  92. 28-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  93. 04-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  94. 18-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  95. 05-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  96. 16-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  97. 12-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  98. 14-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 5

  99. 07-Jun-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  100. 08-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Case: Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 316/2017, Additional Sessions Judge IV, Saran (04.06.2026) Verdict: Of nine accused charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and attempted murder, the court acquitted seven (Ram Janam Prasad, Ram Babu Prasad, Ram Ekbal Manjhi, Dhanesh Manjhi, Satyendra Manjhi, Guddu Manjhi, and Arjun Manjhi) for failing to prove unlawful assembly. However, Raj Kumar Manjhi was convicted under IPC §325 (grievous hurt—3 years RI + ₹10,000 fine) and Nagendra Manjhi under §323 (simple hurt—6 months SI + ₹1,000 fine), with evidence establishing they specifically assaulted the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case