MD Ashraf vs State of Bihar — 453/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010039632026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

3694/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

453/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

RLY MUJAFFARPUR MUZAFFARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(5)
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 79
Child Labour Act Section 3/14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD Ashraf

    Adv. Affaque Ahmad Siddiqe

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected MD Ashraf's bail petition in a human trafficking case. Ashraf was arrested on 15.1.2026 for allegedly transporting fearful children on trains to various cities for labor work under sections 143(V) BNS, 79 JJ Act 2015, and the Child Adolescent Labour Act 1986. The judge found the prosecution evidence credible with corroborating witness statements and a prepared seizure list, and declined bail citing case gravity. The trial was directed to conclude within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 453/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected MD Ashraf's bail petition in a human trafficking case. Ashraf was arrested on 15.1.2026 for allegedly transporting fearful children on trains to various cities for labor work under sections 143(V) BNS, 79 JJ Act 2015, and the Child Adolescent Labour Act 1986. The judge found the prosecution evidence credible with corroborating witness statements and a prepared seizure list, and declined bail citing case gravity. The trial was directed to conclude within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case