Baban Ray vs State of Bihar — 951/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 17th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010037042026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
3460/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
951/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
7-Excl.Spl.Excise.Court-02
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1244
Police Station
SONEPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baban Ray
Adv. Rahul kumar Chaudhary
-
2.Sonu Kumar
Adv. Rahul kumar Chaudhary
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Baban Ray and Sonu Kumar in a liquor prohibition case, finding prima facie evidence of their involvement in illegal liquor manufacturing (230 litres countrymade liquor and equipment seized). The court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain anticipatory bail under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, which mandatorily restricts such relief in excise offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Excl.Spl.Excise.Court-02
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 951/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Baban Ray and Sonu Kumar in a liquor prohibition case, finding prima facie evidence of their involvement in illegal liquor manufacturing (230 litres countrymade liquor and equipment seized). The court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain anticipatory bail under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, which mandatorily restricts such relief in excise offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts