RANJIT KUMAR ALIAS RANJIT KUMAR MONI vs State of Bihar — 413/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010036842026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3441/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

413/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

RLY MUJAFFARPUR CHAPRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(5)
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 79
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act Section 3/14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT KUMAR ALIAS RANJIT KUMAR MONI

    Adv. santosh kumar

  2. 2.MD KAMAAL

    Adv. santosh kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Ranjeet Kumar and Md. Kamaal, who were arrested for human trafficking and child labor offenses under BNS §143(V), JJ Act §79, and Child Labour Act §3/14. The court found the prosecution's case credible based on witness statements, seizure of evidence (train tickets, cash, mobile phones), and the gravity of the human trafficking charges, despite the petitioners' claims of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Ranjeet Kumar and Md. Kamaal, who were arrested for human trafficking and child labor offenses under BNS §143(V), JJ Act §79, and Child Labour Act §3/14. The court found the prosecution's case credible based on witness statements, seizure of evidence (train tickets, cash, mobile phones), and the gravity of the human trafficking charges, despite the petitioners' claims of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case