VINAYAK PRATAP SINGH ALIAS TARZAN vs State of Bihar — 940/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(A). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036792026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3437/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

940/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

23-Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

100

Police Station

DORIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINAYAK PRATAP SINGH ALIAS TARZAN

    Adv. Rajnish kumar singh

  2. 2.SUMAN KUMAR

    Adv. Rajnish kumar singh

  3. 3.RAFTAR SINGH ALIAS BHOLA ALIAS ROHIT KUMAR

    Adv. Rajnish kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused persons (Vinayak Pratap Singh, Suman Kumar, and Raftar Singh) in a case involving recovery of 134.200 litres of illicit foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court found prima facie accusation against the petitioners and held that the anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 940/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused persons (Vinayak Pratap Singh, Suman Kumar, and Raftar Singh) in a case involving recovery of 134.200 litres of illicit foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court found prima facie accusation against the petitioners and held that the anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case