Dileep Mahato vs State of Bihar — 932/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 18th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010036622026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
3420/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
932/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
7-Excl.Spl.Excise.Court-02
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
127
Police Station
RIVIL GANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dileep Mahato
Adv. Atul Kumar Ojha
Dileep Mahato
Adv. Atul Kumar Ojha
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Excl.Spl.Excise.Court-02
Disposed
Awaiting Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Dileep Mahto and another accused charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for illegal liquor business. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on recovery of 300 liters of countrymade liquor and criminal antecedents, and held it lacks jurisdiction to entertain anticipatory bail petitions under Section 76(2) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Dileep Mahto and another accused charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for illegal liquor business. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on recovery of 300 liters of countrymade liquor and criminal antecedents, and held it lacks jurisdiction to entertain anticipatory bail petitions under Section 76(2) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts