Ashok Manjhi vs State of Bihar — 931/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036612026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3419/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

931/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

23-Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

KOPA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Manjhi

    Adv. Dinesh Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Ashok Manjhi's anticipatory bail petition filed in connection with an alleged illicit liquor case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court found prima facie evidence against the petitioner, as 10 litres of illicit countrymade liquor was recovered from a dalan near his house, and he fled the spot when police arrived, with local people identifying him by name. The court held that anticipatory bail was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Ashok Manjhi's anticipatory bail petition filed in connection with an alleged illicit liquor case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court found prima facie evidence against the petitioner, as 10 litres of illicit countrymade liquor was recovered from a dalan near his house, and he fled the spot when police arrived, with local people identifying him by name. The court held that anticipatory bail was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case