Laxman Sah alias Laxman Kumar Sah vs State of Bihar — 930/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),74,75,78,96. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036602026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3418/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

930/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

10-2nd D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

211

Police Station

KOPA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),74,75,78,96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Sah alias Laxman Kumar Sah

    Adv. Yogendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Chhapra granted anticipatory bail to the applicant Lakshman Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 74, 75, 78, and 96 (related to indecent assault and abduction of a minor). The court found the matter suitable for bail, considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, the settlement between parties, and reliance on a High Court precedent. The applicant was ordered to furnish bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties (one female family member and one rural resident) and surrender within one month or face arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd D.A.S.J.

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd D.A.S.J.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Chhapra granted anticipatory bail to the applicant Lakshman Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 74, 75, 78, and 96 (related to indecent assault and abduction of a minor). The court found the matter suitable for bail, considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, the settlement between parties, and reliance on a High Court precedent. The applicant was ordered to furnish bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties (one female family member and one rural resident) and surrender within one month or face arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case