Sonu Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar — 407/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),303(2),317(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010036582026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3417/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

407/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

20-12th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

248

Police Station

CHHAPRA TOWN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),303(2),317(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonu Kumar Singh

    Adv. Mahamaya Prasad mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of accused Sonu Kumar Singh, who is charged with theft of 70 lakh rupees from a bank ATM cash replenishment vehicle under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 303(2), 60, and 317(2). The court found strong evidence against the accused, including his confessional statement admitting involvement, witness corroboration, recovery of 68 lakh rupees, and the serious nature of the offence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    12th D.A.S.J.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    12th D.A.S.J.

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    12th D.A.S.J.

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    12th D.A.S.J.

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 407/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Sonu Kumar Singh, who is charged with theft of 70 lakh rupees from a bank ATM cash replenishment vehicle under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 303(2), 60, and 317(2). The court found strong evidence against the accused, including his confessional statement admitting involvement, witness corroboration, recovery of 68 lakh rupees, and the serious nature of the offence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case