Sanjay Manjhi vs State of Bihar — 928/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036542026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3413/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

928/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

23-Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

DORIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Manjhi

    Adv. Vijay Kumar sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Sanjay Manjhi's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court found prima facie evidence against the petitioner, as 40 liters of illicit countrymade liquor was recovered from the spot during a police raid and local witnesses identified him as the person who fled the scene, making the anticipatory bail petition unmaintainable under Section 76(2) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Excl.Spl.ExciseCourt-3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 928/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Sanjay Manjhi's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court found prima facie evidence against the petitioner, as 40 liters of illicit countrymade liquor was recovered from the spot during a police raid and local witnesses identified him as the person who fled the scene, making the anticipatory bail petition unmaintainable under Section 76(2) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case