Ujjawal Kumar Singh vs Rohit Singh @ Girja Singh And Otrs. — 156/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,326,341,307,302,447,379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSR010036102022
Filing Number
3609/2022
Filing Date
02-Apr-2022
Registration No
156/2022
Registration Date
19-Apr-2022
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
5-4th D.A.S.J.
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
501
Police Station
SONEPUR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ujjawal Kumar Singh
Adv. DPO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Singh @ Girja Singh And Otrs.
-
2.Nandu Kumar
-
3.Vijay Kumar
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
07-Jun-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
03-May-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
11-Dec-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
06-Jun-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
02-Mar-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
23-Dec-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
30-Nov-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
30-Oct-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
05-Oct-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
03-Aug-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
11-May-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
15-Apr-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
01-Apr-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
23-Jan-2023
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
24-Dec-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
09-Dec-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
24-Nov-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
09-Nov-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
17-Oct-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
27-Sep-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
12-Sep-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
30-Aug-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
11-Aug-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
03-Aug-2022
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Bail Application Dismissed The court rejected the bail petition of Rohit Kumar Singh, accused of serious offenses including attempted murder (IPC §302, 307), dacoity, and related charges in connection with an assault on August 26, 2021, that resulted in the death of the complainant's father. Despite arguments that the accused was falsely implicated and had no criminal history, the court found the gravity of the charges and available evidence against him did not warrant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Aug-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
19-Jul-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
29-Jun-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
17-Jun-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
01-Jun-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
11-May-2022
Evidence
ADJ 13
-
06-May-2022
Charge
ADJ 13
-
30-Apr-2022
Charge
ADJ 13
-
26-Apr-2022
Charge
ADJ 13
-
20-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2022
Bail Application Dismissed The court rejected the bail petition of Rohit Kumar Singh, accused of serious offenses including attempted murder (IPC §302, 307), dacoity, and related charges in connection with an assault on August 26, 2021, that resulted in the death of the complainant's father. Despite arguments that the accused was falsely implicated and had no criminal history, the court found the gravity of the charges and available evidence against him did not warrant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts