Subham Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar — 824/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 125(a),125(b),281,109(1),352,351(2),(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010030812026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

2871/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

824/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

4-11th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

227

Police Station

MASHRAKH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 125(a),125(b),281,109(1),352,351(2),(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subham Kumar Singh

    Adv. Deepak Kumar Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Shubham Kumar Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 125(a), 125(b), 281, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), and 3(5), arising from an alleged incident where he allegedly drove a company car recklessly and assaulted the complainant and his brother. The court found that injuries were minor, the accused had no criminal history, and a counter-case was pending between the parties, justifying bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for 30 days pending trial court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    11th D.A.S.J.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 824/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Shubham Kumar Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 125(a), 125(b), 281, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), and 3(5), arising from an alleged incident where he allegedly drove a company car recklessly and assaulted the complainant and his brother. The court found that injuries were minor, the accused had no criminal history, and a counter-case was pending between the parties, justifying bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for 30 days pending trial court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case