Shailesh Kumar alias Shailesh Sahani alias Kaliya vs State of Bihar — 333/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a),26,35. Disposed: Uncontested--Bail Rejected on 10th March 2026.

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010030222026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

2816/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

333/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Bail Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

497

Police Station

SONEPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a),26,35

Petitioner(s)

Shailesh Kumar alias Shailesh Sahani alias Kaliya

Adv. Ravi

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Bail Order

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shailesh Kumar, accused in an extortion and illegal firearms case (Sonpur P.S. Case No. 497/2024). The court found that the petitioner was implicated based on co-accused confessions disclosing a planned extortion conspiracy, and that an illegal pistol was recovered during investigation. Considering the serious nature of the allegations, recovery of incriminating evidence, and the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, the court concluded there was a likelihood of recidivism if bail were granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shailesh Kumar, accused in an extortion and illegal firearms case (Sonpur P.S. Case No. 497/2024). The court found that the petitioner was implicated based on co-accused confessions disclosing a planned extortion conspiracy, and that an illegal pistol was recovered during investigation. Considering the serious nature of the allegations, recovery of incriminating evidence, and the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, the court concluded there was a likelihood of recidivism if bail were granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case