Shailesh Kumar alias Shailesh Sahani alias Kaliya vs State of Bihar — 333/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a),26,35. Disposed: Uncontested--Bail Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010030222026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

2816/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

333/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

497

Police Station

SONEPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a),26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shailesh Kumar alias Shailesh Sahani alias Kaliya

    Adv. Ravi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shailesh Kumar, accused in an extortion and illegal firearms case (Sonpur P.S. Case No. 497/2024). The court found that the petitioner was implicated based on co-accused confessions disclosing a planned extortion conspiracy, and that an illegal pistol was recovered during investigation. Considering the serious nature of the allegations, recovery of incriminating evidence, and the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, the court concluded there was a likelihood of recidivism if bail were granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Shailesh Kumar, accused in an extortion and illegal firearms case (Sonpur P.S. Case No. 497/2024). The court found that the petitioner was implicated based on co-accused confessions disclosing a planned extortion conspiracy, and that an illegal pistol was recovered during investigation. Considering the serious nature of the allegations, recovery of incriminating evidence, and the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, the court concluded there was a likelihood of recidivism if bail were granted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case