Sabha Khatun vs State of Bihar — 314/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 26th March 2026.

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010028322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

2645/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

JALALPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

Sabha Khatun

Adv. Abhimanyu kumar Ray

Madina Khatun

Adv. Abhimanyu kumar Ray

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

26-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Bail Order

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Sabba Khatun and Madina Khatun in a temple idol theft case (Section 379 IPC), finding that there were no specific and direct allegations against them, the charges appeared general and omnibus in nature, and they had already undergone significant custody (since 17.01.2026). The accused were ordered released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Sabba Khatun and Madina Khatun in a temple idol theft case (Section 379 IPC), finding that there were no specific and direct allegations against them, the charges appeared general and omnibus in nature, and they had already undergone significant custody (since 17.01.2026). The accused were ordered released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case