Sabha Khatun vs State of Bihar — 314/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010028322026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

2645/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

JALALPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sabha Khatun

    Adv. Abhimanyu kumar Ray

  2. 2.Madina Khatun

    Adv. Abhimanyu kumar Ray

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Sabba Khatun and Madina Khatun in a temple idol theft case (Section 379 IPC), finding that there were no specific and direct allegations against them, the charges appeared general and omnibus in nature, and they had already undergone significant custody (since 17.01.2026). The accused were ordered released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Sabba Khatun and Madina Khatun in a temple idol theft case (Section 379 IPC), finding that there were no specific and direct allegations against them, the charges appeared general and omnibus in nature, and they had already undergone significant custody (since 17.01.2026). The accused were ordered released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case