RAMJEE PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Cr.rev - Cr.Rev.

CNR: BRSR010025562026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

2390/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

422

Police Station

MARHAURA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

RAMJEE PANDEY

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

KALAWATI DEVI

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

RANJITA DEVI

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

VIJAY LAXMI DEVI

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

RAJESH PANDEY

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

RAKESH PANDEY

Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

addmission

17-02-2026

addmission

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of order

Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case