RAMJEE PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.
Cr.rev - Cr.Rev.
CNR: BRSR010025562026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
2390/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
422
Police Station
MARHAURA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMJEE PANDEY
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
KALAWATI DEVI
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
RANJITA DEVI
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
VIJAY LAXMI DEVI
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
RAJESH PANDEY
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
RAKESH PANDEY
Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
addmission
addmission
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | addmission | |
| 17-02-2026 | addmission |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts