RAMJEE PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.rev - Cr.Rev.

CNR: BRSR010025562026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

2390/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

422

Police Station

MARHAURA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMJEE PANDEY

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

  2. 2.KALAWATI DEVI

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

  3. 3.RANJITA DEVI

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

  4. 4.VIJAY LAXMI DEVI

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

  5. 5.RAJESH PANDEY

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

  6. 6.RAKESH PANDEY

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Ray

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by six accused persons (Ramjee Pandey and others) challenging their declaration as absconders and issuance of permanent arrest warrants. The court upheld the lower magistrate's order, finding that proper legal procedures—including summons, bailable and non-bailable warrants, and proclamations under Section 82 CrPC—were served but the accused repeatedly failed to appear, leaving no option but to declare them absconders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case