Om Prakash Yadav vs State of Bihar — 610/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),121(2),132,262,265,223,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010023002026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

2155/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

610/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

221

Police Station

RASULPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),121(2),132,262,265,223,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Om Prakash Yadav

    Adv. Swaraj Pratap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Om Prakash Yadav, holding that despite allegations of his involvement in assaulting police and escaping custody, the absence of injury reports and the Patna High Court's similar grant to co-accused persons placed him on equal footing. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including interrogation availability, non-tampering with witnesses, and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 610/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Om Prakash Yadav, holding that despite allegations of his involvement in assaulting police and escaping custody, the absence of injury reports and the Patna High Court's similar grant to co-accused persons placed him on equal footing. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including interrogation availability, non-tampering with witnesses, and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case