Pankaj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 431/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),117(3),118(2),119(2),324(6),324(6),324(5),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 09th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010014762026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
1387/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
431/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
5-4th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
995
Police Station
GARKHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pankaj Kumar
Adv. Affaque Ahmad Siddiqe
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th D.A.S.J.
Disposed
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 18-02-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 31-01-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 29-01-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saran (Chapra) granted anticipatory bail to Pankaj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault, robbery, and criminal conspiracy. The court found that while the victim suffered injuries to his right hand and leg, the allegations against the petitioner were general and omnibus in nature, he had no criminal antecedents, and investigation was still pending. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on surrender/arrest within 30 days and compliance with Section 438(2) Cr.PC conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saran (Chapra) granted anticipatory bail to Pankaj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault, robbery, and criminal conspiracy. The court found that while the victim suffered injuries to his right hand and leg, the allegations against the petitioner were general and omnibus in nature, he had no criminal antecedents, and investigation was still pending. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on surrender/arrest within 30 days and compliance with Section 438(2) Cr.PC conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts