Anil Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar — 423/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420. Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010014252026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

1341/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

423/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

4-11th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

331

Police Station

CHHAPRA MUFFASSIL

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Kumar Singh

    Adv. Pardeep Kumar Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Anil Kumar Singh, who was accused of embezzling government funds (approximately 8.87 lakh rupees) meant for a water scheme project in Vishnupur village panchayat under IPC sections 406, 409, and 420. The court found the charges serious, noting that the investigation revealed actual work worth only 5.68 lakh rupees against the 14 lakh rupees claimed, establishing prima facie case of criminal breach of trust and cheating by the accused along with other panchayat officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    11th D.A.S.J.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    11th D.A.S.J.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    11th D.A.S.J.

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Anil Kumar Singh, who was accused of embezzling government funds (approximately 8.87 lakh rupees) meant for a water scheme project in Vishnupur village panchayat under IPC sections 406, 409, and 420. The court found the charges serious, noting that the investigation revealed actual work worth only 5.68 lakh rupees against the 14 lakh rupees claimed, establishing prima facie case of criminal breach of trust and cheating by the accused along with other panchayat officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case