Birendra Ram vs State of Bihar — 354/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 467,468,471,420,414,120B. Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 06th April 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010011522026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2026
Filing Number
1076/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
354/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
405
Police Station
MARHAURA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Birendra Ram
Adv. Biresh kumar chaubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran rejected Birendra Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a motorcycle theft case (IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, 120(B)). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioner, including confessional statements from co-accused persons naming him as an associate in the motorcycle stealing and sale conspiracy, corroborated by informant and witness statements in the case diary. The investigation was still ongoing, warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 354/2026
Summary: The Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran rejected Birendra Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a motorcycle theft case (IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, 120(B)). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioner, including confessional statements from co-accused persons naming him as an associate in the motorcycle stealing and sale conspiracy, corroborated by informant and witness statements in the case diary. The investigation was still ongoing, warranting denial of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts