Rakesh Rai vs State of Bihar — 266/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),304(B)/34. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 25th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010008562026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
802/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
266/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
Akilpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rakesh Rai
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
2.Urmila Devi
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
3.Vikash Rai
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
4.Shailesh Rai
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
5.Sonu Rai
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
6.Nisha Devi
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
-
7.Pooja Kumari
Adv. Vinod Kumar Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons (Rakesh Rai and others) charged with dowry-related cruelty and murder under IPC Sections 498A and 304B. The court found that a 12-day delay in filing the complaint without satisfactory explanation, lack of independent witness support, a compromise petition between parties, and the accused's clean criminal record made custodial interrogation unnecessary. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Awaiting Case Diary
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 266/2026
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons (Rakesh Rai and others) charged with dowry-related cruelty and murder under IPC Sections 498A and 304B. The court found that a 12-day delay in filing the complaint without satisfactory explanation, lack of independent witness support, a compromise petition between parties, and the accused's clean criminal record made custodial interrogation unnecessary. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts