Irfan Khan vs State of Bihar — 237/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010007372026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

688/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

5-4th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

559

Police Station

BANIAPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Irfan Khan

    Adv. Rajendra Prasad Sah

  2. 2.Nayaim Khan

    Adv. Rajendra Prasad Sah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saran rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Irfan Khan and Nayaim Khan in a cheating case. The accused allegedly posed as overseas job agents, defrauded the informant of Rs. 1,60,000 by promising employment in Saudi Arabia but delivering visas for Kyrgyzstan instead. The court found sufficient allegations against them supported by the case diary and determined that investigation was still pending, making them ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th D.A.S.J.

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    4th D.A.S.J.

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    4th D.A.S.J.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    4th D.A.S.J.

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    4th D.A.S.J.

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saran rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Irfan Khan and Nayaim Khan in a cheating case. The accused allegedly posed as overseas job agents, defrauded the informant of Rs. 1,60,000 by promising employment in Saudi Arabia but delivering visas for Kyrgyzstan instead. The court found sufficient allegations against them supported by the case diary and determined that investigation was still pending, making them ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case