Tarkeshwar Prasad vs State of Bihar — 236/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010007342026
e-Filing Number
15-01-2026
Filing Number
685/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
236/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
5-4th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
410
Police Station
EKMA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tarkeshwar Prasad
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
Shailendra Kumar Prasad alias Shailendra Kumar
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
Rabindra Prasad alaias Pappu Prasad alias Rabindra Kumar
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
Radheshyam Prasad
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th D.A.S.J.
Disposed
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
Awaiting Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 20-02-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 06-02-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary | |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Tarkeshwar Prasad, Shailendra Kumar Prasad, Ravindra Prasad, and Radheshyam Prasad) in a land dispute case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, the case appeared to be a counter-case arising from an underlying land dispute, and the accused had property and no flight risk, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to CrPC section 438(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Tarkeshwar Prasad, Shailendra Kumar Prasad, Ravindra Prasad, and Radheshyam Prasad) in a land dispute case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, the case appeared to be a counter-case arising from an underlying land dispute, and the accused had property and no flight risk, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to CrPC section 438(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts