Tarkeshwar Prasad vs State of Bihar — 236/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010007342026
e-Filing Number
15-01-2026
Filing Number
685/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
236/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
5-4th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
410
Police Station
EKMA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tarkeshwar Prasad
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
-
2.Shailendra Kumar Prasad alias Shailendra Kumar
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
-
3.Rabindra Prasad alaias Pappu Prasad alias Rabindra Kumar
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
-
4.Radheshyam Prasad
Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Aditya
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Tarkeshwar Prasad, Shailendra Kumar Prasad, Ravindra Prasad, and Radheshyam Prasad) in a land dispute case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, the case appeared to be a counter-case arising from an underlying land dispute, and the accused had property and no flight risk, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to CrPC section 438(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th D.A.S.J.
-
25-Feb-2026
Awaiting Case Diary
4th D.A.S.J.
-
20-Feb-2026
Awaiting Case Diary
4th D.A.S.J.
-
06-Feb-2026
Awaiting Case Diary
4th D.A.S.J.
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Case Diary
4th D.A.S.J.
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 236/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Tarkeshwar Prasad, Shailendra Kumar Prasad, Ravindra Prasad, and Radheshyam Prasad) in a land dispute case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries were simple in nature, the case appeared to be a counter-case arising from an underlying land dispute, and the accused had property and no flight risk, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to CrPC section 438(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts