State of Bihar vs Sanjay Rai Othrs Advocate - Sri Mahesh Prasad — 2582/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,307,323,324,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSR010004642010
Filing Number
29775/2014
Filing Date
01-Oct-2010
Registration No
2582/2014
Registration Date
01-Oct-2010
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
5-4th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
239
Police Station
SONEPUR
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanjay Rai Othrs Advocate - Sri Mahesh Prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Sessions Court in Sarangarh, Bihar acquitted all 14 accused persons on March 30, 2026, in a case involving a violent clash during school elections in Chausiya village (October 29, 2007) that resulted in the death of a key figure named Shatrudhan Roy. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite charging the accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 379, and 341, as the eyewitness testimonies were contradictory and inadequate to establish guilt, thereby granting the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th D.A.S.J.
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
4th D.A.S.J.
-
19-Mar-2026
Arguments
4th D.A.S.J.
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
4th D.A.S.J.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
06-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
11-Dec-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
27-Nov-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
03-Nov-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
13-Oct-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
19-Sep-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
08-Sep-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
22-Aug-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
31-Jul-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
05-Jul-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
4th D.A.S.J.
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
4th D.A.S.J.
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
07-Sep-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
11-Jun-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
09-Apr-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
23-Mar-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
A.D.J 11
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 11
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 11
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
A.D.J 11
-
21-Aug-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
06-Jul-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
09-Jun-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
24-Apr-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
10-Mar-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
24-Feb-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
23-Jan-2023
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
06-Dec-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
11-Oct-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 11
-
17-Aug-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
11-Jul-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
03-Jun-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
13-May-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
14-Mar-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
19-Feb-2022
Arguments
A.D.J 4
-
10-Jan-2022
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
01-Dec-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
21-Oct-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
13-Sep-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
01-Sep-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
31-Jul-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
19-Jul-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
18-May-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
08-Apr-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
04-Mar-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
15-Feb-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
11-Jan-2021
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
16-Dec-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
25-Nov-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
13-Oct-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
15-Sep-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
15-Jul-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
22-Jun-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
21-May-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
21-Apr-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
14-Feb-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
24-Jan-2020
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
16-Dec-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
06-Nov-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
26-Sep-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
03-Sep-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
31-Jul-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
08-Jul-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
12-Jun-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
09-May-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
16-Apr-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
14-Mar-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
20-Feb-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
31-Jan-2019
Evidence
A.D.J 4
-
18-Dec-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
06-Nov-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
17-Sep-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-Aug-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
25-Jun-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
08-May-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
02-Apr-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
23-Feb-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
11-Jan-2018
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
29-Nov-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
18-Oct-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
28-Aug-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
04-Aug-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
19-Jun-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
05-May-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-Apr-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
03-Mar-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
20-Feb-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
24-Jan-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
02-Jan-2017
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
09-Dec-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
22-Nov-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
25-Oct-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
16-Sep-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
31-Aug-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
10-Aug-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
23-Jul-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
13-Jul-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
28-Jun-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
13-Jun-2016
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
28-May-2016
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
11-May-2016
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
13-Apr-2016
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
10-Mar-2016
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
26-Feb-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
12-Feb-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
25-Jan-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
11-Jan-2016
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
14-Dec-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
24-Nov-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
05-Nov-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-Oct-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
22-Sep-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
08-Sep-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
22-Aug-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
13-Aug-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
03-Aug-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
16-Jul-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
02-Jul-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
20-Jun-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
06-Jun-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
21-May-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-May-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
23-Apr-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
13-Apr-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
24-Mar-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
09-Mar-2015
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-Feb-2015
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
15-Jan-2015
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
05-Dec-2014
Appearence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
14-Jul-2014
Evidence
ADJ-I/Spl.SC/ST,ChildrenCourt
-
07-Jun-2014
Evidence
-
24-Nov-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2010
Case filed
Registration No. 2582/2014
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Sessions Court in Sarangarh, Bihar acquitted all 14 accused persons on March 30, 2026, in a case involving a violent clash during school elections in Chausiya village (October 29, 2007) that resulted in the death of a key figure named Shatrudhan Roy. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite charging the accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 379, and 341, as the eyewitness testimonies were contradictory and inadequate to establish guilt, thereby granting the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts