Raja kumar vs State of Bihar — 150/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 26th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010004282026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
394/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
150/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
4-11th D.A.S.J.
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
222
Police Station
NAYA GAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raja kumar
Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav
Dhananjay Kumar
Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav
Visal Mahto
Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-11th D.A.S.J.
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Dhanjay Kumar and Vishal Mehto in a case involving kidnapping and extortion of a 14-year-old girl (FIR under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5)). The court found the allegations serious based on case records, witness statements, and police investigation findings, determining that the accused's release on bail was not justified at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Dhanjay Kumar and Vishal Mehto in a case involving kidnapping and extortion of a 14-year-old girl (FIR under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5)). The court found the allegations serious based on case records, witness statements, and police investigation findings, determining that the accused's release on bail was not justified at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts