Raja kumar vs State of Bihar — 150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010004282026

e-Filing Number

09-01-2026

Filing Number

394/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

4-11th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

NAYA GAON

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raja kumar

    Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav

  2. 2.Dhananjay Kumar

    Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav

  3. 3.Visal Mahto

    Adv. Ravi Ranjan kumar yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Dhanjay Kumar and Vishal Mehto in a case involving kidnapping and extortion of a 14-year-old girl (FIR under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5)). The court found the allegations serious based on case records, witness statements, and police investigation findings, determining that the accused's release on bail was not justified at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    11th D.A.S.J.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    11th D.A.S.J.

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Dhanjay Kumar and Vishal Mehto in a case involving kidnapping and extortion of a 14-year-old girl (FIR under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5)). The court found the allegations serious based on case records, witness statements, and police investigation findings, determining that the accused's release on bail was not justified at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case