Chandra rai vs Ram prit rai and oths — 10146/2003

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-May-2026

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRSR010003052003

Filing Number

10146/2003

Filing Date

02-Feb-2000

Registration No

10146/2003

Registration Date

10-Feb-2000

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

DERNI

Year

1998

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandra rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram prit rai and oths

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 27-May-2025

    Evidence

    12th D.A.S.J.

  14. 07-May-2025

    Evidence

    12th D.A.S.J.

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    12th D.A.S.J.

  16. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    12th D.A.S.J.

  17. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  18. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  19. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 12

  20. 15-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  22. 13-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  23. 27-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  24. 25-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  26. 20-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  27. 20-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  28. 03-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  29. 18-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  30. 27-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  31. 11-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  32. 24-May-2024

    Copy of orderView PDF

  33. 24-May-2024

    Copy of orderView PDF

  34. 24-May-2024

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: Accused Ramnath Manjhi in Sessions Trial No. 146A of 2002 (State of Bihar v. Ramnath Manjhi) was declared an absconder on 17/05/2024 due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple processes issued since 2022. A permanent warrant was directed to be issued against him and his name entered in the absconders register. On 24/05/2024, with both the accused and witnesses absent, the court directed the Officer-in-Charge to deposit the case record in the record room, as evidence under Section 299 Cr.P.C. could not be proceeded with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  35. 24-May-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  36. 08-May-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  37. 22-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  38. 16-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  39. 20-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  40. 05-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  41. 10-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  42. 08-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  43. 06-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  44. 06-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  45. 13-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  46. 17-Aug-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  47. 31-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  48. 04-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  49. 17-Jun-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  50. 08-Jun-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  51. 19-May-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  52. 03-Apr-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  53. 09-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  54. 24-Aug-2022

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  55. 25-Jul-2022

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  56. 12-May-2022

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  57. 11-Apr-2022

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  58. 07-Mar-2022

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  59. 23-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  60. 30-Sep-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  61. 19-Jul-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  62. 18-Jun-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  63. 12-Apr-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  64. 10-Feb-2021

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  65. 24-Dec-2020

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  66. 06-Nov-2020

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  67. 24-Sep-2020

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  68. 24-Jun-2020

    Arguments

    ADJ 12

  69. 18-May-2020

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  70. 30-Mar-2020

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  71. 02-Mar-2020

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  72. 27-Jan-2020

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  73. 21-Dec-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  74. 21-Oct-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  75. 18-Sep-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  76. 23-Aug-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  77. 15-Jul-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  78. 19-Jun-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  79. 29-May-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  80. 26-Apr-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  81. 28-Mar-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  82. 05-Mar-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  83. 30-Jan-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  84. 04-Jan-2019

    Arguments

    Ftc-I

  85. 20-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  86. 02-Feb-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10146/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Accused Ramnath Manjhi in Sessions Trial No. 146A of 2002 (State of Bihar v. Ramnath Manjhi) was declared an absconder on 17/05/2024 due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple processes issued since 2022. A permanent warrant was directed to be issued against him and his name entered in the absconders register. On 24/05/2024, with both the accused and witnesses absent, the court directed the Officer-in-Charge to deposit the case record in the record room, as evidence under Section 299 Cr.P.C. could not be proceeded with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case