Nitesh Singh vs State of Bihar — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,76,303(2),352. Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 24th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010000872026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2026
Filing Number
77/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
536
Police Station
GARKHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitesh Singh
Adv. Ravi Ranjan
-
2.Shailesh Singh
Adv. Ravi Ranjan
-
3.Rajesh Singh
Adv. Ravi Ranjan
-
4.Manorama Devi
Adv. Ravi Ranjan
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
The Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Nitesh Singh, Shailesh Singh, Rajesh Singh, and Manorama Devi) in a case involving assault and theft allegations. The court found the allegations general and omnibus in nature, with section 109 of BNS lacking corroboration and section 303(2) being merely ornamental, coupled with the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent and co-accused already being enlarged on bail. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2026
The Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Nitesh Singh, Shailesh Singh, Rajesh Singh, and Manorama Devi) in a case involving assault and theft allegations. The court found the allegations general and omnibus in nature, with section 109 of BNS lacking corroboration and section 303(2) being merely ornamental, coupled with the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent and co-accused already being enlarged on bail. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts