CHAND ALAM vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Chandramauleshwar Prasad — 291/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),126(2),115(2),352,109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRSP010027192026

e-Filing Number

19-05-2026

Filing Number

2600/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

291/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

MISSION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),126(2),115(2),352,109(1)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAND ALAM

    Adv. MD AINUL KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Chandramauleshwar Prasad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Chand Alam and Md. Siraj Alam in a caste-based assault case, finding that the injury report (simple chin wound caused by blunt object) did not substantiate allegations of a knife attack on the throat, and that allegations were general and omnibus in nature with similar co-accused already enlarged on bail. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

  4. 26-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

  5. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 291/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Chand Alam and Md. Siraj Alam in a caste-based assault case, finding that the injury report (simple chin wound caused by blunt object) did not substantiate allegations of a knife attack on the throat, and that allegations were general and omnibus in nature with similar co-accused already enlarged on bail. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case