RANJEET SINGH vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Chandramauleshwar Prasad — 505/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(5),118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th May 2026.
REGULAR BAIL.
CNR: BRSP010023252026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2026
Filing Number
2222/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
505/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
SHEKHOPUR SARAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJEET SINGH
Adv. SRI SUSHIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Chandramauleshwar Prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to Ranjit Singh, who was accused of caste-based abuse and assault causing a grievous fracture to an informant's left leg under SC/ST Act provisions. The judge found that despite prosecution evidence supporting the allegations, the petitioner had no criminal record, the injury was non-vital, and prolonged custody was unwarranted, thus ordering his release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
20-May-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
15-May-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 505/2026
The court granted bail to Ranjit Singh, who was accused of caste-based abuse and assault causing a grievous fracture to an informant's left leg under SC/ST Act provisions. The judge found that despite prosecution evidence supporting the allegations, the petitioner had no criminal record, the injury was non-vital, and prolonged custody was unwarranted, thus ordering his release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts