BARHAMDEV CHAUDHARY vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 283/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012892026

Filing Number

1230/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

283/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

109

Police Station

EXCISE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARHAMDEV CHAUDHARY

    Adv. PIYUSH KUMAR CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Excise Court in Shekhpura granted bail to Brahmadev Chaudhary, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018, after finding no prior criminal history and considering mitigating circumstances. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and directed the accused not to participate in similar offenses, appear regularly in court, and comply with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Excise Court in Shekhpura granted bail to Brahmadev Chaudhary, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018, after finding no prior criminal history and considering mitigating circumstances. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and directed the accused not to participate in similar offenses, appear regularly in court, and comply with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case