RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 281/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012872026

Filing Number

1228/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

EXCISE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY

    Adv. Sri Ashish Kumar 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Special CJM court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Ravindra Chaudhary in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018, finding him to be an innocent laborer with no prior criminal history who was falsely implicated. The court accepted the bail application with conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties of equal amount, and an undertaking that the accused will not engage in similar activities, appear regularly in court, and comply with all court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special CJM court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Ravindra Chaudhary in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018, finding him to be an innocent laborer with no prior criminal history who was falsely implicated. The court accepted the bail application with conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties of equal amount, and an undertaking that the accused will not engage in similar activities, appear regularly in court, and comply with all court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case