RAKESH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 280/2026
Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A,30C,37. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL.
CNR: BRSP010012862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1227/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
280/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
HATHIYAWA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAKESH KUMAR
Adv. RANVIJAY KUMAR
SABIR PASWAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Rakesh Kumar and Sabir Kumar, who were arrested on March 6-7, 2026 under Sections 30(a), 30(c), and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 for manufacturing and selling illegal liquor. The court found the accused's bail application meritorious, considering their personal circumstances, lack of prior criminal history (except one case against Rakesh), and family dependence, and ordered their release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-involvement in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Rakesh Kumar and Sabir Kumar, who were arrested on March 6-7, 2026 under Sections 30(a), 30(c), and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 for manufacturing and selling illegal liquor. The court found the accused's bail application meritorious, considering their personal circumstances, lack of prior criminal history (except one case against Rakesh), and family dependence, and ordered their release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-involvement in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts